BigPoppaBear

Yes, I do have a degree in history thanks. I know there were two wars, but I was saying that TD was meant to be now-ish, and RA2 is now-ish, so the two games can't be related.

WHat confused me was that the GDI General says to you before the last mission: "Kane's built his temple in Sarajevo. If that sounds familiar, its because almost 100 years ago another madman started World War One." So Tiberian Dawn was meant to be set around the time it was released. But Red Alert was set in the 1940s, and Red Alert 2 in the present day. So I don't see anyway they can relate.

I voted Britain, but I meant Korea, cos the BEs are better than Snipers.

You coulda also written "For the latest news and discussion, click on to www.cncnz.com."

C&C was classic. The music was atmospheric, the weapons and tanks were cool, there was tiberium, and the FMVs were really classy. The storyline was great on the NOD side, the way they build up all the enigma around Kane. Then there was Carter and Morelli,and the Commander guy that looked really stressed out all the time. Stalin was nowhere near as intimidating as Kane, and Stavros and Gradenko were kinda lame as support charcters. The airstirke, ion cannon, and nuclear strike far outweigh the Chronosphere, Iron Curtain and A-bomb. On the other hand, the music of RA was the anthem for the whole series. the Hell March is undoubtedly the coolest tune in any video game ever. The gameplay was faster paced and the events were more realistic. Plus being able to control planes and naval units - much better. Why did the Tiberium games run away from naval units anyway?

I've done all the buildings for the Svoiets, and finished the basic infantry. I have four essays due the end of November, so whatever i add will be in dirbs and drabs.

You're all so immature... Oh wait I just got it. He he, it would so be worth it.

3 sides is usually about baance. The third side supposedly acts like a counterweight to a bi-polar dispute. In single player missions, (and to an extent in multiplayer games) it expands gameplay to incorporate different alliances and enemies. Personally I could never stop thinking of Yuri's team in YR as an appendage to the Sovs... [plug]As for two sides having more units than three sides, thats bollocks. Check out RA: Escalation.[/plug] Over three sides is when units get limited, as it gets more difficult to give unique weapons to each side.

Huh?

Have no fear Gazdude. Each day, read one line. Then, you'll have finished it before I put up the next bit. Hey?

Welcome to the forum. What would you like to see in the future of CnC?

You never know, you never know, you never know until you blow alright!!! Alright! It would be awesome...

I conceptualise. This is my role.

I was trying not to conform to the ****ty "omg omg 1ets atnk russh!11!!1!" tactics.

I always found that the BF shot at the target on its way to crushing it. My favourite offensive strategy is a Black Eagle flight group of about 16. You can lose half of it and still be able to destroy your target. The last time I played I built walls about five lines thick all around my base with prism towers spread about just in range of each other and Patriots. It was going well until I got prism rushed.

luk3us Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 8:53 am Post subject: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dude its meant to be a war. Do you really think that there are going to be hundreds of super models running around in bras and panties toting M16s? Man that would be a weird site. Being charged at my a swamp of hot super models with machine guns coming to kill you. Where? Where? Give me titties.

To use RA2 or YR would be class, since my comp is too **** to run Generals. I don't know if my changes to the gameplay would work in it though. CHeers for offering, if you wanna give it a try, feel free and post the results.

It's a game concept, inspired by WestWood and written by me. I would like to see it as a mod someday, but all the modding/dev. teams are busy working on their own phenomenal mods/games (note: especially the Renegade Alert soldiers). And with my complete lack of knowledge or skill in modding, I will possibly never see it in real-life.

C&C: WW3 is a game concept developed by myself. It will be obsolete as soon as I finish writing my Red Alert: Escalation concept. I post the concepts in the hope that someone will find a way to make a mod from it, since I myself have no modding skills whatsoever.

Ach...learn *shudder*

Cheers luk3us. I'm currently writing the Soviet construction options, but its taking longer to research cos sites with Soviet WW2 tank specs are usually in Russian... slight problem.

you forrgot speeling

Tard, yall.

Generals is effectively a response to kick virtual talliban butt and kill a few terrorists along the way... in effect it was a game in response to 9/11. Not as much as that America's Ten Most Wanted game that came out recently...

Oh my god man, can you please use punctuation. My head hurts when I look at your posts. Don't post about a topic in one thread in another thread. This is why threads stay open. As for the actual meat of your post, what are you actually asking? What the third country would be? It would have to be China, seeing as there are only three superpowers in real life. You COULD have a culmination of European armies under the faction "United States of Europe", but that would basically be the Allies from Red Alert. You could have three sides - America vs Europe vs Russia, but that doesn't make much sense. You need to bring the Asian superpower in. Like I do in Escalation. :roll: