RKCoon

Oh, theres no denying that War, with the only thing close to it being a natural disaster, is the greatest scientific and similar advancer of technology -- but it IS costing us our planet. i have a hard time beleiving were gonna get very far OFF the planet while were killing each other.

Thats in result of 4 years of chasing women and realising just what they are (or ratheer, arent capable of, in some cases. again, generalizations here). No, I am not gay. :lol: Sorry buddy, but i gotta laugh at that. ive yet to see an instance where "chasing" women resulted in anything but hardship. the good ones usually land in your lap when yer not looking. anyhoo back on topic... When it comes to Christians vs Muslims vs the rest of them, reality is, most of em stemmed from the same chunk of bloodied desert. my question -- who the fluck cares? why is it that humanity seems to have this propensity for beleiving in releigions so much as to not think twice to kill for them? Insanity at its finest it say.

Er, if memory serves, Islam has been around, what, 7, 8000 years or better? you mean to tell me that isnt enough??

Cygnus -- you get dumped recently? I usually only see comments like that by men that ither got recently badly jilted --- or gay. o.O As far as bushel goes, hed love to -- but theres too much pressure on him as is for being a royal jackass, i mean is approval is curently less than 36% - i mean, how CAN you run the country with less than thirty six percent of the masses agreeing with you? thats just barely one third of the fecking country -- you cant. Oh ya - Work harder, get shafted more by the taxman.

99.99995% of the time, when it comes to religion and those of it admitting its WRONG, it never does end, cause religions despise that -- they know how badly it wrecks thier "credibility" (or, more usually, the total lack thereof).

Sonic had mario beat right from the start and always DID have em beat. thop, the newer games tend to be more and more dissapointing each time, hence why i still have out my Genesis 1 (The big one with the headphone port) and enjoy 16 bit at its finest. but hell, even the 8 bit game gear beat the crap outta the nintento -- just wasnt as well advertised (and an insane battery hog). :/

So much for equality between the sexes eh?

Gunmetal was vastly underrated, for the sole reason it was horrificly buggy on release. too bad, it had a LOT of promise.

Still ,they treat thier women worse than we do our convicts -- thats crap ina hat if ya ask me.

Actually i dont beleive -- as i didnt even WATCh -- the video. im basing my comments on what ive seen and read and analised on my own in the past regarding the matter. Im also a firm beleiver of if it seems far too coincidental, it most likely is anything BUT a coincidence. I think we can sum this up VERY nicely with but three links, that were posted on another board i frequent -- http://home.bellsouth.net/s/editorial.dll?...p;rg=blsadstrgt http://cbs4denver.com/topstories/local_story_067094813.html http://www.kmov.com/topstories/stories/030...l.7d361c3f.html Insanity from all sides, no?

Indeed -- fun with warships is always good So how long till shes ready?

Youd of thought that, for the $$$, wed of gotten a fecking warranty.

I duno id think theyd be closer to $10 duncha think? :lol:

Ive done 12, 14, even 16 hour shifts plenty of times. theres no reason to, it abuses the body too much to do for work. i quit those a long time ago. if iom gonna go that far its gotta be DAMNED worth it. and if i could type today id be happy... sheesh.

Thats correct --- but it does leave an innacuracy in dealing with BC for thew uncertain length of time tween his birth and death.

Wow. gonna be amusing to see bware worm out from that barrage of logic, common sence and truth. (actually tis kinda harsh, were pickin on him and he aint even here yet. :lol: )

Helpless??? What the hell was Afghanistan and Iraq? Massive world powers about to drop nukes on us? not bloody liekly. I wanna know whos next, myself. Now insofar as comparing bushel to hitler, lets see (fair warning, personal feelings rant here )--- Hitler - served with at least some honor in his army. Bush - AWOL at least once, got caught drunk (among other things) while on duty, and has had daddy seal his records away from public scrutiny. Hitler - Won his position as German Chancellor i beleive it was, with over 97% of the voting populace - which if memory serves was well over 70, closer to 80% of the masses - and also recorded in history as gaining office with the single greatestr margin of public support in history, something not even any US president has accomplished. Bush - bought his way in, not once, but twice, with daddys arab freinds oil money. History will go on to record that in reality (or at least in IMHO) he never shoulda got in the first time, to say nothing of the second. Hitler - after forging a number of agreements, treaties and so on, proceeded to break a great deal of them in his expansion efforts. Bush - has broken a great deal of past agreements treaties ad his own laws to get just to this point. Hitler - Orchestrated the Holocaust, which, btw, did in fact have the support, financial and otherwise, of the Vatican. Bush - Is currently engaged in a war to end terrorism, with the Vaticans support, financial and otherwise. (seems funny to me how the Vatican seems to like to fund violence and hatred.) Hitler - Committed some of the greatest atrocities against human rights in known history. Bush - has gone to great lengths to subvert human rights both in the US and abroad. Hitler - Believed to have been found after supposedly committing suicide, but no positive identification has ever been made. Bush - we can only hope for similar, cant we, seince even wishing in public for the prick to die is a crime according to the patriot act. Considering this, i would venture to state that saying Bush is equal to hitler, may be construed as an insult -- to Hitler.

Yep thats EXACTLY what i was saying -- nice to see im not the only one here that knows that.

Oh? you mean the police force that, even while theyve declined somewhat from the days of old, are still better trained, easyer to deal with, and in fact, VASTLY more respected thruout the world than virtually any other policing force? Pfffff. Given a choice id take RCMP over any force , ANY day. (BTW as a side note, the RCMP are still technicly a "paramilitary" orginization, which, i would think, gives them something of an edge over other policing forces.) Now, as far as teaching the wackjobs responsible for 911 -- did it ever occur to you that , bein able to speak english, learning to use various technologies, as well as personal combat and infiltration techniques DID in fact come from the CIA? they were being taught, and this has been proven btw, to go up against the OTHER most powerful force on the planet. it takes little to adjust such training to include the actions undertaken to orchestrate 911,so your point, or rather , emotional complaint, just became mute. Im not saying they were the ONLY ones responcible -- but they WERE a big part of the problem. They knew damned well then, but didnt advertise the fact, that even after the Communist threat was lifted, these people would have a SERIOUS b!tch with the western world, and they went and did it anyway. You think they got that **** and knowledge on thier own? not likely. Oh and General Leang -- I agree with you, up to a point. the attacks were long in coming, but more due to the fact of what the US is and has been doing. However, i still firmly belive that a great deal of "blind eye turning" was involved for this to happen, as has been demonstrated in the past. the whole concept of "Oh well we are the most powerful nation on earth so naturally people are gonna wanna knock us down" does not float terribly well. it takes a LOT more than dedicated people. it takes money, knowledge, intelligence, a substantial backing force and manipulation of local media. i can easily see where SOME of this comes from, but not all. and even back then, the success rate for preventing such large scale attacks was pretty respectable.

Personally, my doubts started the same day as 911. i have a HELL of a time beleiving that a country with the amount of resourses that the us has gettin suckerpunched -- without first turing a blind eye to whats going on, especially with the mad crews they themselves trained. As a side note -- with a current US administration, and in paticular, president approval rating at 36% and DROPPING, i would hardly call the US "Unified with its leader". to be blunt, if this was goin on say 60 years ago, the guy woulda been booted on his ass out of the white house, if not SHOT. Far as i give a damn, the only reason hes still IN power is his money. No more no less. if he was joe blow from idaho hed never of gotten in, nor of stayed in.

Personally, i dont think theyll ever get bin laden --- for if they did theyd have MUCH less cause to "have a war on terror". I would see, however, if someone other than general bushel gets into the white house, they may find him in short order.

Uhm... Does this count? (seriously, these are all that work up here. Ask my GF --- hers is no more thana paperwieght up here. :lol: )

These are all very good points -- but it still comes back to this -- to kill in the heat of a battle is one thing, to defend yourself, but does that mean that, because of these idealogical diffferences that we have to actively go out and kill them, "before they kill us"? i dont see that as making us much different from them -- and in fact falling to the ultimate terrorism that they are doing. Id have to say, theres gotta be a better way than that. if we go out and kill them because they are trying to do the same, there is little difference in the parties and thier actions then. That being said, i see no reason to hold back at all when they DO take such agressive, nonkosher actions against our people. but i wouldnt pussyfoot either -- they bomb a train, we bomg a mosk of thiers. they bomb a city, we level thiers.with this, i would venture to say that, while cruel and cold, we have to be at least ten times more vicious in responce, if they are gonna be like this, otherwise, since envoys of peace are usually shot, a peaceful solution wont work.

I think its VERY important to keep in mind here, that one man/country's "terrorist" is another man/country's "freedom fighter/liberator/resistance/hero/etc". We in the western world forget that, to many peoples ideologies, these characters are the greatest thing since sliced bread, and wont beleive "western infidels" or many other names. makes it a royal b!tch to fight, dont it? Ahh the joys of religion, religious and political indoctoring and so on. Not that such makes it right to us -- only to them. but then, does that mean, that we have the right to wipe them out because they refuse to yeild or even accept our train of thought, just as we dont accept... well, rephrase, that we wont accept or yield to the more violent forms of thier beleifs? Makes for touchy philosophy dont it? l

Many would say that "Not allowing the truth out" is, by defualt, an admission of guilt. Tahts my vote as well.