cyclepsycho

So there IS a reason My parents decided to home school me.

Akward........

They already have made one and I think it is pretty clear they wont make another. I do think EA should give it another go though.

But one needs the other correct? Strategy with out competent tacticians is use just as tactics without strategy are equaly usless.

Some day the tech will catch up with the ideas.

Ah fubar I remember reading that in Bravo Two Zero. Too bad most of that "true story" was fabricated, or so I hear.

Legs-hair=speed, and when I crash and my legs get all lacerated the lack of hair keeps them much cleaner and free from infection. To much information I know.

But you must agree that tactics are only really effective when your field commanders are inteligent enough to think independitly, to a degree.

I was just wondering if anyone knows the technical difference between strategy and tactics. In my mind the difference is this, a tactic no matter how brilliant is not going to win a battle. The use of many tactical maneuvers which are planed by a strategist are what is required to win a battle. So to use tactics effectivly you would need to have people commanding your platoons and divisions to be able to be able take the initiative, but still be able to follow an overal battle plan, something not really available in C&C. My thoughts are this, tactics, while necesary in the real world do not really come into effect in C&C due to the fact that flanking, elevation and troop inteligence are not either used or at the necesary level. What is used in C&C and indeed most STRATEGY games is indeed strategy. Any thoughts? P.S. This seemed like an appropriate community to post this.

being the cyclepsycho that I am I do shave my legs....... But only sometimes.

Kidding about what?

Maybe the aliens were just trying to give us a gift and didn't know any better. Meh lets kill em anyway.

I was wondering if there is a editor for RA similar to the made by Biohazard for TD.

Thanks Battletroop. I am a psycho for cycling.

As do I, the argument, however, still amuses me.