Jump to content

PunWisp

Members
  • Content count

    523
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About PunWisp

  • Rank
    Chief Warrant Officer W-3
  1. I was purely disappointed, yet really not surprised. When it comes to RTS games, EA FAILS, quite literally. And HEY! Whats a great way to finish off a series? Giving what fans want? Nah. Staying true to the series? Nah What should we do! OH! We should basically take entire concepts from other games, scratch the ones that C&C has used for many years, and on the final game use mimics of another game, and even fail at doing that. Bad, just bad. Whos the idiot that thought of on the FINAL C&C game (as they stated). They should destroy what made C&C great and literally mimic another game... Very large, intense battles?: Nope the original base building concept?: Nope the original harvesting concept?: None That alone kills a C&C game... Thats my thought on the subject. And anything with a C&C title, many will buy. Just like if something on ebay was called a ps4, people would pay HUGE bucks to get it, merely because of the name. Its quite interesting. Also Hai thar, I just woke up from my slumber!
  2. Very nice, only thing I hate is the fact I can't reveal my map folder... Theres no folder option to unhide folders.. Its annoying lol
  3. PunWisp

    Didn't ANYBODY like Generals?

    I do enjoy generals, I do agree it seemed rush, and the story was poor but the gameplay was great. Sure it didn't fall into the same storyline, it was a more modern game, but it infact worked as a C&C game, may not be the same story, and to me is good enough for the C&C title. I'm a C&C Veteren and C&C 3 didn't seem oh aw godly like some people think. Yea its a good game, and lot of complaints were made about the story until the expansion, when they filled gaps. But I didn't find the game to be addicting, I would rather play WoW, or even generals then C&C 3, just wasn't addicted, played it a lot at first, then just over time I stopped, and sometimes I go off and on. Online wasn't fun at all, mainly because, most people didn't care about having fun, just winning, and would just rush, rush, rush. lost my interest. Though now it won't even let me online no matter what, I have no idea why, tried making 3 accounts and it wont let me. The AI in Generals was just sucky and predictable, C&C 3 has a very good AI, Brutal is difficult to beat. Generals survies alot on mods but thousands still play online in non-mods. So yea lot of people do play, half go online. I normally only play it with the shockwave mod(Best balanced, oldest mod for it) with Advanced AI mod. so then when your going against GLA on hard they literaly sends hordes of basically random units, and are persistent so it can get hard.
  4. PunWisp

    Advanced AI mod..

    I've checked a lot of obvious spots, but for some reason they are either not there are are corrupted/deleted file.
  5. PunWisp

    Advanced AI mod..

    How so? It makes the AI a lot harder, only the hard enemy though. Also makes it more interesting unlike the predictable AI. I had the mod until I uninstalled the game >.<
  6. It has been requested that your profile be spamzed. Do you accept?

  7. Merry Xmas Punwit. :)

  8. PunWisp

    Advanced AI mod..

    I dont know why but I cannot find this mod anymore, if you put in advanced AI its on a site on one of the links, but when you download it, its no longer available. So can someone give me a link to it?
  9. dont spam my profile

  10. I see you snooping around. Come out come out where ever you are....

  11. So, who is this? and why did you comment on my profile?

  12. PunWisp

    Subfactions/Countries

    Wow you must be a great mod, including if you delete posts that are against your views
  13. PunWisp

    Subfactions/Countries

    EA really sucks at trying something new. Almost all the RTS games they made they add "SUB-FACTIONS" Jesus try something new, they use so much of the same crap in RTS games... For proof at sucking at new things look at the new global conquest in KW... Pathetic for a turn based game... They don't show any regions and its kind of boring, just a small distraction from normal gaming. For a turn based game I would of or Rome:total war. Anyway RA2 wasn't real good with variety of differences between sides besides the single unit on each side, they should only add the most powerful factions (Russia,Germany,Britain,France,Japan,U.S, maybe even Italy) They need to really fix how they make RTS games, because they ain't so great at it besides Graphics, which almost half the game is based off of which also unless made well, fails a lot of games. Gameplay is better then graphics...
  14. PunWisp

    Empire Earth III

    No, actually, I was saying that EE3 was so bad it made C&C3 look like StarCraft - ie, good. And for the record, I'm the biggest StarCraft fanboy on the boards Punny. I see, you werent very specific, that could mean good or bad. But i get it now
×