Gazdude 0 Posted May 11, 2004 America should stay out of affairs that don't concern them. Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 11, 2004 Do you know what I find interesting? How people criticise America for stomping on everyone who disagrees with them, and then they turn into Bush themselves by stomping on those who disagree with them. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 12, 2004 As i said before it wasn't the Japanese who were the bad people it was Emperor Hirohito.. Just like the bad people aren't the Americans it's George Bush.. I agree with you, it's the government not the civilian. But why the people allows someone that bad like Bush to be elected as a presiden? Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 12, 2004 How? It's a pesky thing the West has. It's called democracy. Seriously, Bush was elected in (I won't touch on Florida because I am really not an expert). If Bush had done something very wrong (such as having planned September 11, planted weapons of mass destruction in Iraq) then a move could be made to have him impeeched. Otherwise people will have to settle with voting every electoral year. Share this post Link to post
Guest Rikaelus Posted May 12, 2004 How? It's a pesky thing the West has. It's called democracy. Seriously, Bush was elected in (I won't touch on Florida because I am really not an expert). If Bush had done something very wrong (such as having planned September 11, planted weapons of mass destruction in Iraq) then a move could be made to have him impeeched. Otherwise people will have to settle with voting every electoral year. The west is a democracy about 5% of the time. The rest of the time the government can do pretty much whatever it wants so long as it sugar coats it for the public. Share this post Link to post
Guest Emperor Posted May 12, 2004 But not everybody in Iraq are against US, many people (I mean a grand percentage of population) are happy because they get liberated from Saddam and they will support USA forces as far as possible. American soldiers are trained to be charismatic with civilians. Of course, many people are happy with Saddam overthrow but wants the troops out, and Bush wants the same but as I said before, not now, it's to soon. The military withdrawal got to be gradual. Share this post Link to post
Guest Rikaelus Posted May 12, 2004 But not everybody in Iraq are against US, many people (I mean a grand percentage of population) are happy because they get liberated from Saddam and they will support USA forces as far as possible. American soldiers are trained to be charismatic with civilians.Of course, many people are happy with Saddam overthrow but wants the troops out, and Bush wants the same but as I said before, not now, it's to soon. The military withdrawal got to be gradual. Really? What training have they had with Arabs? A lot of the soldiers in Iraq didn't get far past basic training, I don't think. Or maybe you're suggesting that giving the thumbs up over a naked Iraqi prisoner is "charismatic". Please. Our government doesn't even know how to deal with vastly different cultures-- you think our soldiers do? Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 13, 2004 Well, would being under the rule of, say, Al Qaeda be a better alternative than the American government? Western Democracy? Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 13, 2004 How? It's a pesky thing the West has. It's called democracy. Seriously, Bush was elected in (I won't touch on Florida because I am really not an expert). If Bush had done something very wrong (such as having planned September 11, planted weapons of mass destruction in Iraq) then a move could be made to have him impeeched. Otherwise people will have to settle with voting every electoral year. Hmm, Bush has planned that events, I have heard that much. Is it true? If it is true, he is realy a ******* *******. About western democracy, can you tell me more about that? Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 13, 2004 I don't hold to the theory something like September 11 was planned at all, for the simple reason that it would be utter suicide. Something on such a grand scale would not be able to be contained. And also, what explanation is there for Al Qaeda claiming responsibility? As for western democracy, well, if someone can explain how all that is supposed to work let me know. Share this post Link to post
Guest Emperor Posted May 13, 2004 ...giving the thumbs up over a naked Iraqi prisoner... Are you blaming all the soldiers just because the actions of 4 or 5? :shock: Who are you? Kerry? :? Most of the soldiers know how to deal with civilians. And I'm tired of hearing how that incident it's used for political purposes. :x ...Al Qaeda be a better alternative than the American government? Democracy works fine in theory but you must pay the price, in a country like Iraq I'm not sure if its works, there is many people that will never accept a president form other religion. ...Bush has planned that events... ...If it is true, he is realy a ... That's the most ridiculous theory of conspiracy I ever heard :!: I won't answer that. Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 13, 2004 I just think that the woman who was part of it gives the other women in the armed forces a bad name, and should be punished for it. And the Al Qaeda terrorists who executed Nick Berg, it would be perfectly okay by me if their brains were splattered all over the world, retalliation for Iraqi POW abuse or not. It won't happen, because that is not what fine upstanding people do, but any grizzily end people who prey on innocents meet I am pretty much okay with. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 13, 2004 Nick Berg, that poor guy. Executed by Al Qaeda, it's his fault. Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 13, 2004 Could you please explain the logic behind this? I fail to understand how the blame cannot be placed on the terrorists rather than on an innocent man who was simply trying to aid the Iraqi people. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 13, 2004 I still don't know much about it. It's a new one. Being headless is not good way to died. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 13, 2004 I've read many articles about nick berg since hi is died. It looks like that World War 3 is near, the fight between two big religions. Why it must come this way? Share this post Link to post
Guest Emperor Posted May 13, 2004 It's his fault. What :?: Nick's fault, are you crazy :?: How could it be his fault :?: What it's happens with this man it's an example of why should we destroy AlQaeda, doing what ever it's necessary to find them. I agree with Better Red, there got to be stronger punishment than dead for those acts. Share this post Link to post
Gazdude 0 Posted May 13, 2004 What it's happens with this man it's an example of why should we destroy AlQaeda, doing what ever it's necessary to find them. They were really acting on instinct, the POW's that the Americans (and British i think) were humiliating and torturing angered the Al Queda terrorists to the point of doing this act. Must I remind you that the scale of violence they witness every day is 100x worse than we see. Actually killing someone isn't that bad a thing to them, unlike us. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 14, 2004 Yeah, the US army in Iraq tortured the POW with sadistic. You should see the picture of Iraqis POW being tortured more horyfing than Nick Berg execution. Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 14, 2004 And the people responsible for it should be punished for their actions. The same as the Al Qaeda terrorists who killed Nick Berg should be punished. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted May 14, 2004 Everything should be setteld by peace, not by killing or torturing someone. Both of them is wrong, nor the USA way with torturing the POW and the Al Qaeda who kills everyone who stands against them. Share this post Link to post
Guest Airek Posted May 18, 2004 Well, In Red Alert 2 Your first missions as soviets is to destroy the World Trade Centers Share this post Link to post
Gazdude 0 Posted May 18, 2004 Yeah, the US army in Iraq tortured the POW with sadistic. You should see the picture of Iraqis POW being tortured more horyfing than Nick Berg execution. I doubt it was as horrifying as having your head cut off with a rusty bread knife, but the Americans should be setting an example for the world. Well hopefully Amnesty International will get to the bottom of it and sort out a suitable punishment for those who were supposed to be looking after the POW's... Share this post Link to post
General Leang 0 Posted May 18, 2004 Well, In Red Alert 2 Your first missions as soviets is to destroy the World Trade Centers Wasn't operation Big Apple the one where you place a Psychic Beacon at the World Trade Centre, as opposed to destroying it? Share this post Link to post
Guest Airek Posted May 20, 2004 heh oh yea mabe, but i believe after that you have to destroy them, and the nick berg guy, i believe he was giving a chance to leave but then left the u.s. troops that saved him the first time, a few days later he disappeared and then he was beheaded Share this post Link to post