Ozamist 0 Posted October 1, 2004 Ok for one thers no redalert three ea has thrashed the idea and no tiberum twilight the next name of the game is going to be based on genreals With water new graphics new story new Coders they thrashed the former westwood team washed them out tottaly this time and now its gonna be a new game you can go to japan and see what it is hah thats wher iwent to find this out i cant say the name of it cuz i can be sewd for that but it shall own you oo yeah and uhmm check out my mod Futuer war its the ****e [Copyrighted allrights reservd] Share this post Link to post
Luk3us 63 Posted October 1, 2004 Wow. :roll: Did you also though that EA is really owned by Blizzard and EA are making crap games on purpose so no one buys them and buy Blizzard games instead! Share this post Link to post
BigPoppaBear 0 Posted October 1, 2004 But if Blizzard own EA, why would they make ****e games, cos it wouldn't make any difference? :roll: Share this post Link to post
Saracen 16 Posted October 1, 2004 I agree here... Bullturd Unfortunately Ozamist, you know nothing... Red Alert 3 is a huge possibility since it was Harvard Bonin's production that made Red ALert 2 possible... Harvard was passionate about Red Alert 2, so he may still have the idea for a sequal in the back of his mind. As for C&C 3... Don't hold your breath.. this community may have done enough with EA to pressure them into making the game, only time will tell but this game isn't knocked off until EA says so, and they won't cos it's what we want! A sequal to Generals is unlikely, not for a while yet, maybe after C&C 3. Generals had no storyline, so I think it doesn't deserve a sequal... Generals was created as a game which locked into todays events and moved them into the future a bit.... Generals is effectively a response to kick virtual talliban butt and kill a few terrorists along the way... in effect it was a game in response to 9/11. Somew of the Westwood team are still at EA.... There isn't any decent staff or programmers in EA capable of creating an RTS, that's why the few ex Westwood are there.... If EA were to wash their hands of all other ex-Westwood employees, EA would not have a clue on how to create a decent C&C... sure they may succeed in creating a hugely successful RTS, but it will be just another RTS without any traditional C&C ingrediants. Share this post Link to post
BigPoppaBear 0 Posted October 2, 2004 I agree here...Bullturd Generals is effectively a response to kick virtual talliban butt and kill a few terrorists along the way... in effect it was a game in response to 9/11. Not as much as that America's Ten Most Wanted game that came out recently... Share this post Link to post
Louis EX 0 Posted October 17, 2005 Serious i really dun think there wil be a RA3...Firstly the game is so old Secondly, EA has not really comfirm there will be a RA3 Right now,i bet EA moved on to better graphic games "sigh" Share this post Link to post
Luk3us 63 Posted October 17, 2005 You should try to avoid bringing old topics to light again. Its frowned upon. Share this post Link to post
Apocalypse 0 Posted October 17, 2005 EA has turned C&C into crap. The fueture of C&C is with Petro. They have like all of the Westwood workers. They just need to buy the rights to C&C. They have a new RTS title comeing out this month. It's called Empire at War. If you don't konw what Petro is... http://www.petroglyphgames.com Share this post Link to post
Saracen 16 Posted October 17, 2005 Really, you are bang up to date, not that we run a Empire-At-War website or anything. :roll: No bringing old topics back, they are left in the past for a reason. Share this post Link to post
