How will you defend your base against mass aurora?

[leomar 0]

my gaming buddy just discovered this strategy...

since he can't penetrate my base on the ground or by mass comanche, he built several squadron of aurora and destroyed my base!

 

how will i defend my base against a squadron of aurora?

thanks!

[Guest MadBadger]

Now there are 2 things here.

 

#1 You are a bunkering N00B!!! and not worth the info.

 

or

 

#2 your mates ****e. No bunkered n00b has been made that i can't nail

 

 

Nail his Airfields.

 

Only thing you can do really

 

can get rocket men all over to make sure his arouras are making a 1 way trip.

[leomar 0]

@madbadger

 

thanks for your reply dude!

 

i don't have bunker since im also playing USA then.

my patriots are down since he targets my power supplies! damn! :x

 

yeah, i think MD's will do the job!

thanks!

 

im not newbie in the game, but im always playing with AI's though...

in our P2P games, i can always defend my base but the mass comanche nailed me! whew!

[Guest MadBadger]

i don't have bunker since im also playing USA then.

 

 

ohh dear....

 

not a n00b....

 

ohhh im sorry....

 

 

Bunkering is when you make loads of defences.

 

I'm guessing thats what your mate did...... If he made LOADS of defences its called bunkering (or turtling) In online games people dont like this...... Although a well placed MOAB or arty strike will do wonders GLA don't really have an alternative other than Strikes with rocket buggies

 

 

As for Mass 'Manches

 

Just gota keep an eye on there airfields ect with the GPS reveal/inteligence.

 

Mass Avengers. have pairs of them dotted around with MD's (MD's can use there lazer lock on aircraft as well although its not V good Vs 'Manches)

 

p.s. 'Manches = Commanches

[TheBlackOut 7]

If he has time to get masses of Auroras, you are an idiot.

 

Build humvees and kill his base, or beat him to the auroras.

[VampireA05 0]

turtling also mean lots of cash.

lots of cash mean a lots of force.

 

why you didnt nail him 1st??

[Mother Of All Bombs 0]

Unless ur opponent is laser, they must be really n00b. they should use tomahawks to destroy ur multiple defences, and then roll in the comanches and rockvees. Works like a charm. In return, maybe u should counter them by sending in a colonel burton, possible anthrax bomb, sneak attack, paradrop, tankdrop, carpet bomber, MOAB/FAB, etc. that should take a few planes down, STEALTH COMANCHE (works like a charm on grounded aircraft).

 

*Rockvee = Rocket-filled humvee

[Masked Shah 5]

1) Super-Auras belong to super weapon...

and no one plays as SW general unless they are Noobs without skill.

 

2) I can rush a SW General... and they wouldn't recover due to high cost.

 

3) shutup.

[Mother Of All Bombs 0]

Wat r u even replying too? No one mentioned sw general and besides, she may be bloody sh?t but shes really fun to use in the odd skirmish here and there. And shes really good against tank general. really good.

 

Also, infantry cost the same, u save money o power, defence costs a touch more, alpha auroras cost $2000 compared to the normal aurora which costs $2500. rebuilding isnt too hard unless ur a noob.

[TheGodfish 0]

bunkering is a perfectly legit tactic, and people dont like cos they are to short sighted to see what way the game is going. i bunker at every oppertunity, but thewn i play stealth/toxin . im a grubby stain you just cant remove !

and it makes me happy to know the opponent is bashing their computer to peices in frustration as i hhit and run back to my tunnel creep.

call me a nobo or whatever you want, but i win 92% of the time. if its a winning strat i aint changing it , and the mroe you insult my tactics online the more i laugh

[Inferno 22]

Wat r u even replying too? No one mentioned sw general and besides, she may be bloody sh?t but shes really fun to use in the odd skirmish here and there. And shes really good against tank general. really good.

 

Also, infantry cost the same, u save money o power, defence costs a touch more, alpha auroras cost $2000 compared to the normal aurora which costs $2500. rebuilding isnt too hard unless ur a noob.

 

Defence is cheaper. $900 for a EMP Pat instead of $1000 for a normal one. Only drawback is no tanks and more expensive vehicles.

[Guest General_F]

Well u know, a good offense is a good defense.....

In your situation i would have kept on attacking his airfields with units and if that doesnt work use super weps.

 

the fastest way to shot down lets say air units like aurora, manches, raptors, migs etc u know... is by the gattling cannon but since ur playing on the US so i guess we can exclude that.

 

Unless you want to build hundreds of base defences, just build ....ermmm :roll: what the hell was the name of those rocket guys??? EHH you know what i mean, not the rangers, the bazooka guys:P :x (damn whats were the name of those fat guys:P?)

 

Aiiigght, thats about it,,,, peazzzzzzz

[Guest Rabbit]

Alright, I don't mean to be mean or anything, but just so you know, since you look new around here, you guys have to follow the rules. Check the post dates, and try not to post in any old topics, alright?

[F15pilotX 4]

You really don't like people doing that, now do you?

 

btw, when did you get your staff position back?

[Guest General_F]

HAHAHHAHAHA DAMN I FEELL STUPID.... :lol: :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :shock:

 

Sorry man, i just assumed the topic was well... about a month old(max) or something not since april

 

Alright this will be my last post on this topic:P Srry

EDIT: u gotta admit that the last post was made about 2 months ago and thats not very long time:P

[MagicYuri 0]

Chiiiiiill dude. Hypnotist is just very annoyed with opening up old forums he he (close them all if it bother's you that much, problem solved?)

[Guest Rabbit]

Look man, we just have these rules for a reason. Sure, I'm not an admin, but they're there. Admins shouldn't have to lock EVERY single thread that isn't used anymore.

 

 

Oh, and at F15, I became staff when I released CNCNZ's second podcast.

[Valaron 0]

yes they should.. thats there job.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

No it isn't. Now cut the bull****.

[MagicYuri 0]

Heeeey take it easy Beowulf. It's just a suggestion (not entirely serious anyway). A better suggestion, however, is to lengthen the "life time" of a thread (1-2 months? No wonder people write about the forum being dead). But remember, this is just a suggestion (a bit more serious but still...), not an attempt to question the authority of the admin's (hell hath no fury like an admin scouned or something like that)

[Guest Rabbit]

Dude, stfu. The forums aren't dead because of the rules that are set. The forums have been simmering because of the lack of news from EA and such.

 

Now, quit being a smartass and just follow the damn rules.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

Wise members heed the advice of the forum moderating and administration team.

[Guest General_F]

i just realized i just made this topic active again, any applause people???? 8) 8) 8) 8)

[MagicYuri 0]

Dude you're playing with some heavy fire right there . You'd be wise not to he he. I mean the sentence under the line. Either you want to get banned fast or you got balls fellow traveler

[MagicYuri 0]

Look's like the first option... ah what the hell. Who cares he he