Robber beaten and kept as sex slave

[Luk3us 63]

Robber who broke into hair salon is beaten by its black-belt owner and kept as a sex slave for three days... fed only Viagra

 

A Russian man who tried to rob a hair salon ended up as the victim when the female shop owner overpowered him, tied him up naked and then used him as a sex slave for three days.

 

Viktor Jasinski, 32, admitted to police that he had gone to the salon in Meshchovsk, Russia, with the intention of robbing it.

Teaching a lesson: Olga Zajac, 28, allegedly held 32-year-old would-be robber Viktor Jasinski captive for three days in a back room of her hair salon, feeding him Viagra and having sex 'a couple of times'

 

 

But the tables were turned dramatically when he found himself overcome by owner Olga Zajac, 28, who happened to be a black belt in karate.

 

She allegedly floored the would-be robber with a single kick.

 

Then, in a scene reminiscent of Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction, police say Zajac dragged the semi-conscious Jasinski to a back room of the salon and tied him up with a hair dryer cable.

 

She allegedly stripped him naked and, for the next three days, used him as a sex slave to 'teach him a lesson' - force feeding him Viagra to keep the lesson going.

Life imitating art: The plight of Viktor Jasinski has an odd parallel with the infamous basement scene in Pulp Fiction, starring Ving Rhames

 

The would-be robber was eventually released, with Zajak saying he had learned his lesson.

 

Jasinski went straight to the police and told them of his back-room ordeal, saying that he had been held hostage, handcuffed naked to a radiator, and fed nothing but Viagra.

 

Both have now been arrested.

 

When police arrived to question Zahjac, she said: 'What a bastard. Yes, we had sex a couple of times. But I bought him new jeans, gave him food and even gave him 1,000 roubles when he left."

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-20...fed-Viagra.html

 

 

In Soviet Russia, victim rapes YOU!

[Nmenth 291]

You should fix the duplicate lines in your quote.

 

Aside from that...

[Inferno 22]

The obvious question here is, "is she hot?". If she is, he should stop bitching to be honest

[Doctor Destiny 41]

The obvious question here is, "is she hot?". If she is, he should stop bitching to be honest

There's a good chance she wasn't. But he should stop bitching anyway; he got laid.

[Inferno 22]

 

Google tells me he should stop complaining.

[Nmenth 291]

Social double standard.

 

Girl getting raped by guy = bad. Guy getting raped by girl = good.

 

Eh...

[Inferno 22]

Social double standard.

 

Girl getting raped by guy = bad. Guy getting raped by girl = good.

 

Eh...

Welcome to humanity, Nmenth, where double standard is the standard and people say things without knowing what they are talking about. Did I mention yet that this world has more bull**** in it, than any species of cattle of roughly the same size and weight could possibly have? Well, it does.

[Luk3us 63]

Men can't be raped though, cause men are all sexual deviants who crave sex at all times, and can see women only as sex objects to be used abused and humiliated to fill full their wanton LUST!

 

[/Feminist mode]

[Nmenth 291]

Welcome to humanity, Nmenth, where double standard is the standard

Unfortunately, I am well aware of this already...

[Malevolence 6]

In Soviet Russia, victim rapes YOU!

 

So true, and how fitting! Classic russian reversal quote of the century! :thumbsup:

[Doctor Destiny 41]

Unless she actually pegged the guy, it's not rape. Seriously, a woman cannot really dominate a man the same way a man can dominate a woman. I mean, the woman broke the law since she technically kidnapped the guy so she should be punished for it.

 

[EDIT] After a moment of thought, lock the bitch up for rape. They're always screaming about equality so here you go! Choke on that one, Feminazis!

[Nmenth 291]

Unless she actually pegged the guy, it's not rape. Seriously, a woman cannot really dominate a man the same way a man can dominate a woman.

Yes it is.

 

She's a black belt, tied him up, and fed him Viagra, this is a specific scenario, not a generalization.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

She's a black belt, tied him up, and fed him Viagra, this is a specific scenario, not a generalization.

This is literally the only situation where this applies. Seriously.

[Inferno 22]

This is literally the only situation where this applies. Seriously.

Not really. Drugging people doesn't require superior strength.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

That's really domination if someone's out. That's a dick move.

[Nmenth 291]

I don't really see how domination is really relevant. Yes, men are naturally bigger and stronger than women, and that does mean it is far easier for a man to rape a woman, but women can rape men and while it is somewhat rare, it is not unheard of.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

Domination is all that's relevant in a rape. That's entirely what rape is about. It's not about sex; it's proving your domination over another person. To be quite honest, I doubt the woman in question was trying to really prove that type of dominance. She's just kind of a nutty bitch.

[Nmenth 291]

Domination is all that's relevant in a rape. That's entirely what rape is about. It's not about sex; it's proving your domination over another person.

You are talking about the psychology of rape, but that is more or less debatable and theoretical, rape is non-consensual sex; that is all. Legally, motive has never been an issue with male against female rape (which is not to say the abuser doesn't use it in defense), why should it suddenly be relevant for female against male?

 

"Teaching him a lesson" via restraint and humiliation sounds like domination to me anyway. I wonder how many male rapists justified their actions as "teaching her a lesson"? Quite a few, I'd wager.

 

I'll also argue that strength is not a necessary factor in achieving the feeling of dominance. For instance, hackers that create computer viruses for no reason other than mass cyber-destruction can get off on a feeling of dominance over their "inferiors" without ever needing to see them or have any physical confrontation at all. Strength of body is only the easiest way to enforce dominance, but I think the feeling can even be amplified when it is someone weaker dominating the strong.

[Inferno 22]

Domination is all that's relevant in a rape. That's entirely what rape is about. It's not about sex; it's proving your domination over another person. To be quite honest, I doubt the woman in question was trying to really prove that type of dominance. She's just kind of a nutty bitch.

If you think women are not capable of dominating, I think you're quite wrong. Women are not as innocent as they appear, or as you would like to believe.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

You are talking about the psychology of rape, but that is more or less debatable and theoretical, rape is non-consensual sex; that is all. Legally, motive has never been an issue with male against female rape (which is not to say the abuser doesn't use it in defense), why should it suddenly be relevant for female against male?

Rape is all about the psychological effects, not the physical. Rapists don't do what they do just to get their rocks off; they do it to prove dominance for their own satisfaction. This goes for male and female. The law doesn't take motive into account because it doesn't need to, but to deny that it is a very large factor in a rape like this would be foolish and ludicrous.

 

"Teaching him a lesson" via restraint and humiliation sounds like domination to me anyway. I wonder how many male rapists justified their actions as "teaching her a lesson"? Quite a few, I'd wager.

Personal justification is their motive. As such, it's a very large part of the act. Most people need a justifying reason to do something, even if it's twisted and only makes sense in their heads.

 

I'll also argue that strength is not a necessary factor in achieving the feeling of dominance. For instance, hackers that create computer viruses for no reason other than mass cyber-destruction can get off on a feeling of dominance over their "inferiors" without ever needing to see them or have any physical confrontation at all. Strength of body is only the easiest way to enforce dominance, but I think the feeling can even be amplified when it is someone weaker dominating the strong.

Relating virus creation to rape is not only ludicrous, it's insulting.

 

If you think women are not capable of dominating, I think you're quite wrong. Women are not as innocent as they appear, or as you would like to believe.

I'm not quite sure where I said that this was relegated to men only in the response that you quoted.

[Nmenth 291]

Relating virus creation to rape is not only ludicrous, it's insulting.

I was talking about the psychology of domination in this context, not comparing rape to hacking...

[Doctor Destiny 41]

Creating a virus isn't about domination of anything. It's about just generally being a dick because you can.

[Nmenth 291]

That is ridiculous. Most people do not commit acts of evil against others simply because they can, they do it because they can justify it in their own mind and/or because it makes them feel superior... i.e. domination of the inferior.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

People can be dicks just to be dicks. I think you're overestimating humanity here.

[Nmenth 291]

Well I think you are generalizing humanity. People are not just either good or evil, people do what they do for a reason and may not even consider themselves or their actions to be evil when anyone without bias can clearly see they are.