Greg Burdett WWN reports from Aleppo

[jeffnz 23]

Here's an example of BBC's typical garbage reporting:

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36939137

Russia and Syria announced the opening of what they called humanitarian corridors for civilians and rebels wanting to surrender, but few people are reported to have used them, fearing they would be targeted.

 

Opposition activists have dismissed as a lie Russian claims that 160 civilians had left rebel-held districts.

 

Few people have been reported leaving via humanitarian corridors - really? I can go to RT's Youtube channel and find a video which shows dozens of people leaving, and that's just one of the escape routes from Aleppo. There's another 3. Also who is targeting the escaping civilians? According to people in the video below, it's the moderate cannibals who are preventing civilians from leaving. No mention of this on BBC.

 

 

I notice that last week the New Zealand media reported only on "human rights" in Syria, mentioning civilian casualties but not the success of the Syrian Army. When will this madness end? Only when one Vladimir Putin and his vision for a one-world order stops! This is Greg Burdett, WWN, from somewhere in Aleppo city.

 

*camera zooms out to reveal green screen*

 

Good good, now do it again in French and German! Is that camera still running?

 

*GUNSHOT*

 

One good thing that I will say about CNN is that they have hired some seriously hot women just recently. Erin Burnett in particular! Though I prefer Gayane Chichakyan: for her hair, good looks, and her unique ability to annoy the hell out of Whitehouse press people Plus Gayane doesn't have a hideously sickening smile, she looks really cautious at times it's funny. I feel sorry for the Americans on this forum. How do you put up with those bleach blonde bimbos and their botox addiction? ROFL nothing like it exists in NZ! Sorry guys I had to lighten this otherwise miserable post. Don't watch Fox. The women on Fox look like prostitutes!

[HOPE1134 28]

I feel like this account has been hacked.

[jeffnz 23]

On a gaming forum these days, humour is forbidden and everything is about "being hacked" or "being trolled". Why do gamers have to be such a sarcastic bunch of simpletons? Where are the cool people? Oh yeah there's a game dev meet up this Thursday in my city. I g2g on Thursday night, sorry, gotta go IRL for a change LOL!

[Nmenth 291]

I feel like this account has been hacked.

I was going to say he is saying the same type of stuff he always has, but I am a fan of facts over opinion, so I decided to actually verify it.

 

You write from 7 different IPs, jeffnz??? Are you a nomad or something?

 

Anyway, despite the difficulty involved in pairing up his numerous IP addresses, I can confirm his account has not been hacked.

[Lauren 78]

Ya he's just writing his "oh I recently read x" garbage. It's just always a different topic but the pattern is always the same, be it this, pokemon go, programming, linux, open source, etc.

[jeffnz 23]

Ya he's just writing his "oh I recently read x" garbage. It's just always a different topic but the pattern is always the same, be it this, pokemon go, programming, linux, open source, etc.

 

Do you really have to reduce everything to a pattern? That's dry and boring. You should stop analysing everything as if it's a science that has to be explained with patterns. I could explain media propaganda by analysing patterns, but I won't, because that would be boring. Why do you feel the urge to explain other users on a forum, by using patterns? Why is it bad, if everything on a forum is a case of "oh I recently played x" or "I recently watched x movie"? There's nothing garbage about it. If you're suggesting that I'm wrong because I'm often taking a negative position, then that's absurd too. Different perspectives on life, perhaps?

 

While most people are happy playing AAA games and watching Hollywood films, and taking prozac, I am not happy with that. I find fault with organisations, systems, applications, and generally whatever, and I like to express that. I'm not going to shut up or take a pill that reduces sensation, because being critical of things and being pissed off is not an illness, it's natural and necessary. We're in a zombie society where people don't care about anything, or they do care, but only in a contrived scientific way, based on "analysis".

 

Maybe you could read my thread about c++ and SDL configuration, and "analyse" what the problem is with most of the documentation. But don't bother, because I'll write my own documentation and then *gasp* there will be a thread where I take a position position on something (eg. I just read my own website and it was EXCELLENT). Then I'll have a pattern of threads praising my own projects and writing, and I'll have a pattern of kissing my own butt. Then an armchair psychiatrist will tell me that I have a narcissism disorder, because of a "pattern".

 

It won't be long until I stop being nomadic. Yes I seriously do use 7 different IP addresses. Usually only 3. The main library I frequent and 2 or 3 houses that belong to family. I don't have internet where I live, but as soon as I do get internet, I'm going to start writing documentation.

[TaxOwlbear 20]

BBC never claimed that 160 people left - they reported that Russia claimed that 160 left. Also, the Russia Today (seriously, Russia Today?) report spoke of "dozens" of people. A dozen is twelve people, so 160 qualifies for "dozens". If it was significantly more (say, 300+ people), they probably would have said "hundreds".

 

What exactly are you complaining about?

[Lauren 78]

Yes, analyzing and finding patterns is in my nature, which is why I excel in certain things (helped a lot when I went through cnc3 which in turn let me make a lot of discoveries which propelled cnc3 modding forward quite a bit, just an example) while other people do in other areas.

Also obviously how a documentation is written is quite dependent on who writes it. People in computer science tend to have an analytical mind, with which you seem to take issue. No wonder it gives you a hard time. Do you see the pattern there?

Edited August 19, 2016 by Lauren

[jeffnz 23]

This war is really hotting up. The US top brass have discussed implementing a "no fly zone" under which they would shoot down any Russian or Syrian air craft over Aleppo. They admit that this would lead to a war with Russia but that doesn't seem to worry them. If they do start a war, it will allow the Chinese to "field test" their radar systems, which are currently deployed in Syria. That would be useful for China: they'd have radars that work really well, based on past combat experience. They'd be ready for a naval/air battle in the South China Sea.

 

Although the US claims it made a 'mistake' when killing 60+ Syrian Army soliders last weekend, the Syrian government has said that the bombing on Syrian forces lasted at least one hour. It appears that the attack was a deliberate and nasty provocation, designed to "send a message". Let's see how the yanks like it now that the food trucks have been bombed, and the water supply cut off. Al Qaeda is getting hungry and thirsty in Aleppo. Poor terrorists

 

After 9/11, the US brutally tortured Al Qaeda terrorists, now the US is wringing-hands over the human rights of terrorists. Oh, how times change!

[Traymen 6]

They'd be ready for a naval/air battle in the South China Sea.

 

War with whom? Philippines? Vietnam?...

 

Although the US claims it made a 'mistake' when killing 60+ Syrian Army soliders last weekend, the Syrian government has said that the bombing on Syrian forces lasted at least one hour. It appears that the attack was a deliberate and nasty provocation, designed to "send a message".

 

Gosh, this is a war. Each side makes horrendous things. Each tries to win or at least gain advantage upon enemy. It just happens that both most powerful countries decided to check their equipment in such "fail state" like Syria. They would clash whenever else, but Assad was close to Russian sphere of influence and West just tried to take an opportunity to overthrow this dictator and remove presence of Russian fleet in Mediterenean Sea.

 

So Jeff, US isn't the only one to blame...

 

After 9/11, the US brutally tortured Al Qaeda terrorists, now the US is wringing-hands over the human rights of terrorists. Oh, how times change!

 

You know... it's hard to say about who you're talking about. From what i know, there are several rebel organizations in Syria, the government, the Peshmergas (Kurds) and the Daesh. I doubt that US or Russia hands weapon to Daesh, so... yeah...

[jeffnz 23]

Dear Members of Parliament:

While most of you have taken the bait on the issue of Donald Trump's locker-room "bro talk", I ask for your attention on leaks concerning Hillary Clinton's plan for Syria, as seen in two attached image files. In these two small image files you will see that Hillary Clinton's plan in Syria is to overthrow the government and install a CIA "puppet regime".

In summary, these leaks show:

1. Hillary Clinton supports arming militants who're against ISIS, but Hillary Clinton also plans to use the same militants against the Syrian Army. We are told by the 'objective' Western media that Russia is prolonging the war; but we are not told that Hillary Clinton wants to prolong the war in Syria by arming terrorists and overthrowing Assad. This is not about democracy and human rights, it's about the CIA's plan to kill Assad by proxy and install an even worse dictatorship (with an added risk of ISIS controlling Damascus).

2. Hillary Clinton admits that the US has only taken "limited action" against ISIS in Syria. Protecting ISIS is part of her plan, you see, Hillary Clinton uses ISIS in the way that a person uses a spade or a screw driver. ISIS is a tool. They are allowed to fight the Syrian Army up to a point, then the Americans will come in, bomb everyone they don't like, and install their puppet regime. Until that happens, ISIS is essentially an American ally in Syria and all US air strikes against ISIS are pure theatre - as Hillary Clinton says in the leaked email, U.S. actions against ISIS in Syria are "limited" (read: have no effect). The U.S. did nothing when ISIS captured Palmyra in 2015, and it was Russia that liberated Palmyra from ISIS earlier this year.

3. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding ISIS atrocities and Hillary Clinton has put no sanctions on either nation.

4. Although not mentioned in the attachments, Hillary Clinton said in the 2nd debate, that she wants a no-fly zone over Syria. This would mean going to war against Russia. Question: should a person with Hillary Clinton's brainless-ness be allowed access to the red button? There is a 0% chance of the U.S. establishing a "no-fly zone" over Syria. If U.S. planes attack Russia's Hmeymim air base, the Russians will retaliate with S-400 and S-300VM missile launchers. Many U.S. planes will be shot down and the only player with a no-fly zone will be Russia. You cannot enforce a no-fly zone from the air, when all your planes are being blown out of the sky by advanced missile systems equipped with long-range radar.

If MPs are not aware of it, I will make this very clear: Russian officials have openly stated that they will shoot down U.S. planes over Syria, should the U.S. have the nerve to bomb the Syrian Army again. You might think that the U.S. Navy can defeat Russia, but at what cost? The S-400 and S-300VM can shoot down cruise missiles, air craft and drones. Their range is hundreds of kilometres. Also, the S-300VM is not the S-300 that Russia recently sold to Iran. The S-300VM is an upgraded version, these launchers don't come at Warehouse prices. One of the S-300VM launchers is deployed at Russia's Tartus naval base, right in the Mediterranean. It's there to shoot down cruise missiles, should Hillary Clinton become President and suddenly have an itch to start a nuclear war.

In conclusion, I ask John Key and Andrew Little to comment on Hillary Clinton's plan for Syria, specifically her suggestion of a no-fly zone, which top U.S. generals have said will lead to a war against Russia. If those of you reading this were disgusted by Trump's locker-room "bro talk" then I hate to ruin the fun for you, but we could see a war against Russia as early as February or March next year, should Hillary Clinton become President of The World.

If Aleppo is discussed in our Parliament then I hope that members will not forget about the advanced missile launchers at the Hmeymim and Tartus bases. There is no room for discussion about Trump's antics in our media or our Parliament. I'm not concerned about sexism from 10 years ago, I'm concerned about global instability and nuclear weapons. Imagine a man shoving his hand up a woman's vagina. Now imagine a nuclear bomb going off and vaporising tens-of-thousands of people. Can members see that one issue here is infinitely more concerning than the other? Drop the emotion and the sentiment and think about how dire this situation could get, if we ignore Hillary Clinton's leaked emails regarding Syria. I'm tired of "women this, women that" and "sexism this, sexism that". Let's discuss the leaked emails and Hillary Clinton's obsession with wanting to become the President of The World.

Regards,

Jeff Mitchell

[TaxOwlbear 20]

The fact that Assad has to go has been the official position of the U.S. government since... 2012 or so. You are four years late, Jeff.

 

Also, if Russia's military hardware is so amazing that they could win a local war with the Americans, why are the rebels and ISIS still around?

[jeffnz 23]

The fact that Assad has to go has been the official position of the U.S. government since... 2012 or so. You are four years late, Jeff.

 

They have indeed stated that he "must go" but they never specified how they would do it. They should offer more details

 

Also, if Russia's military hardware is so amazing that they could win a local war with the Americans, why are the rebels and ISIS still around?

 

Oh, wait and see what happens next

 

Once Aleppo is recaptured, the campaign to end ISIS will kick into gear.