Just curious...

[Azrael 0]

Which is better: Starcraft, or C&C (the old ones, mind you, it's impossible to compare the new C&C games with Starcraft)? Both are classic games, and are good, but really, which is better?

[TheBlackOut 7]

Kind of biased since this is a CNC forum...

 

As stated, C&C ftw.

[Doctor Destiny 41]

StarCraft... hands down. The story is infinitely better and WAY more intricate than C&C. Sorry dudes but StarCraft is still my RTS.

[Luk3us 63]

The Terrans own you...

[TheBlackOut 7]

C&C still pwns.

[Guest MadBadger]

hehe 2/7 CNC still pwns SC!

[Doctor Destiny 41]

Considering this is a C&C board, one would expect C&C to win. A biased poll proves nothing.

Oh, StarCraft is still better.

[WhOIsInTeResTed InMyNaMe? 0]

Starcraft would pwn in the past, but they didn't start an entire universe of games, like CnC, so CnC is better......

PS: Starcrat 2 sucks!!!!! :roll:

[Sonic 296]

StarCraft... hands down. The story is infinitely better and WAY more intricate than C&C.

How can you say that when you don't the whole C&C story, its not finished you know

[Doctor Destiny 41]

No matter how far C&C goes, StarCraft is still more intricate and more beautifully weaved than C&C's story...

 

PS: Starcrat 2 sucks!!!!!

There is no StarCraft 2... yet. Dip****.

[Luk3us 63]

Considering this is a C&C board, one would expect C&C to win. A biased poll proves nothing.

 

Precisely.

 

Besides J-Fire_Man isn't here, so that poll should be 3 to 9!!!

[Alphabear 11]

starcraft was good but not as good as cnc

[Guest Rabbit]

No matter how far C&C goes, StarCraft is still more intricate and more beautifully weaved than C&C's story...

 

PS: Starcrat 2 sucks!!!!!

There is no StarCraft 2... yet. Dip****.

 

 

 

EDIT:

 

Oh, and beowulf, by the way, read the first paragraph of this site:

 

http://www.purera2.com/

[WhOIsInTeResTed InMyNaMe? 0]

No matter how far C&C goes, StarCraft is still more intricate and more beautifully weaved than C&C's story...

 

PS: Starcrat 2 sucks!!!!!

There is no StarCraft 2... yet. Dip****.

It's not yet, but what i've seen and heard of it.......(it wasnt good). And , anyway, if those were lies...... they had a lot of years to develop Stracraft2, and by today it seems that Starcraft was a good game, but Blizzard didnt relased new games biased on it, Starcraft is in the past, Westwood is still relasing CnC games

[TheBlackOut 7]

All the StarCraft 2 pictures out are fakes.

[Luk3us 63]

Blizzard have still to complete Starcraft Ghost, before they move foward with the starcraft series... Its just that Starcraft Ghost is taking forever to finish...

[Riparius 0]

Starcraft is cool (as seen in my sig), but CnC KICKS ASS!!!

 

 

Blizzard have still to complete Starcraft Ghost, before they move foward with the starcraft series... Its just that Starcraft Ghost is taking forever to finish...

 

They are STILL making it??? I thought it was abandoned...

 

It is going to be like Duke Nukem Forever (they have made it for like 5 years....)

[TheBlackOut 7]

Duke Nukem got a deadline now, December 31, 2006. The parent company gave them some money and basically said, "Finish it, or your balls are mine".

 

That means their division will be shut down.

[Luk3us 63]

I don't think that game is ever coming... Threats or no threats.

 

They are STILL making it??? I thought it was abandoned...

 

After some investigating, it seems you're right, its been "indefinitely postponed"... Meh.

 

Which means they have no excuse now to start making Starcraft 2.

[Acerz492 1]

Blizzard have still to complete Starcraft Ghost, before they move foward with the starcraft series... Its just that Starcraft Ghost is taking forever to finish...

 

Dude. They're busy with the Burning Crusade at the moment, which is waaaaaay more important that Starcraft Ghost. :wink:

[TheBlackOut 7]

Blizzard have still to complete Starcraft Ghost, before they move foward with the starcraft series... Its just that Starcraft Ghost is taking forever to finish...

 

Dude. They're busy with the Burning Crusade at the moment, which is waaaaaay more important that Starcraft Ghost. :wink:

 

NO.

[Riparius 0]

Duke Nukem got a deadline now, December 31, 2006. The parent company gave them some money and basically said, "Finish it, or your balls are mine".

No offence, but where did you get that?

 

The release date of this game is "When it's done". Anything else, and we mean anything else is someone's speculation. There is no date. We don't know any date. If you have a friend who claims they have "inside info", or there's some game news site, or some computer store at the mall who claims they know - they do not. They are making it up. There is no date. Period.

Anyway...

I don't think that game is ever coming... Threats or no threats.

 

Oh it's coming, it's definitely coming.

 

 

Is Starcraft 2 gonna be like a strategy game or a FPS??

[Azrael 0]

Whoah, I said the old C&C games, here's a list:

 

1. TD

2. TS

3. RA

and lastly, Sole Survivor (EWWWW!).

 

Now, you can't really compare the new C&C games and the old ones, since the new C&C games are new in the first place... And also, personally, I think Starcraft is a bit better... The good thing is that it wasn't mutilated to a money-making game by Blizzard, not like what EA did to the C&C (mostly on Generals), and being only one game, you can see that Starcraft made a HELL LOT less than the entire C&C series did, which does show it's made for the fun of the buyer, not the MONEY of the buyer, like EA did with C&C by using the label C&C for Generals, when in fact it was alot different...

[Luk3us 63]

Is Starcraft 2 gonna be like a strategy game or a FPS??

 

It better be an RTS. An FPS would just be gay especially for a sequel to a RTS game...

[WhOIsInTeResTed InMyNaMe? 0]

Now, you can't really compare the new C&C games and the old ones, since the new C&C games are new in the first place... And also, personally, I think Starcraft is a bit better...

RA is better than Starcraft (but both of them are awesome games, I still play them)