Doctor Destiny 41 Posted May 6, 2008 I am currently posting on my laptop on stolen wireless. I have a Dell Latitude 530 with a few upgraded specs. 2.0 gHz dual core, 2GB of RAM, integrated video, integrated wireless/Ethernet and a 120GB hard drive. It's pretty bad ass for a freebie a school. And I almost forgot, a big bonus is that I have XP instead of Vistaids! Share this post Link to post
Sonic 296 Posted May 6, 2008 2GB of RAM..... that reminds me. I need to get another 1GB for my laptop, 1GB alone isn't enough. Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted May 7, 2008 It's a 4:3 resolution 15 inch. I can only do 1024x768 on it. XD Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted May 9, 2008 And I almost forgot, a big bonus is that I have XP instead of Vistaids! its amazing how microsoft can stuff up an os this much, did they do trials or anything because i know alot of people who hate vistaids and are downgrading (well really upgrading) to xp. the two last people i know with vista are my cousin (who uses his computer nearly never) and my mates family computer (but they all have xp laptops that they use instead). the only point in microsoft releasing vistaids is to make more money selling xp Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted May 9, 2008 I used Vista here at school and it's not quite as bad as everyone says. I don't intend to use it for my "fun" activities because that's what I have XP for. Share this post Link to post
Sonic 296 Posted May 13, 2008 I used Vista here at school and it's not quite as bad as everyone says. I don't intend to use it for my "fun" activities because that's what I have XP for. Vista is not that bad, it as some annoying things though like User Account Control. I turn it off yet Vista bitches at me to turn it back. The idea of turning it off in the first place was to eliminate all the prompts and warnings. Most people have negative comments about Vista simply because its a Microsoft product. Or they have tried running it on a computer that id below minimum spec. You know the people who think its bull**** that Vista won't their 1.2 Ghz Celeron with 512 MB RAM. Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted May 14, 2008 the little things like that are what annoy me about vista, and why would you try to upgrade a 1.2 Ghz Celeron with 512 MB RAM to vistaids? you would think they would realise they needed a new one as soon as they used someone elses i hear so much about the downsides to vistaids but can someone on cncnz tell me the good points (if there are any worth mentioning) of having vistaids instead of xp? Share this post Link to post
Sonic 296 Posted May 14, 2008 At least use the correct name of the product if you want to have a proper discussion about it. Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted May 14, 2008 Only a handful of people are allowed to use Vistaids. Julbri, you are not one of them. Anyway... Vista's not so bad with SP1. Actually somewhat more usable with it. May get a copy of Vista for my next desktop. Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted May 15, 2008 haha fine didn't relise it was exclusive, hadn't been around when that started so are you saying you would prefer vista with sp1 for everyday useage? thats fair enough, i mean windows could have done alot worse when they created vista Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted May 15, 2008 Yes, that word is very exclusive. Anyway, yes, Vista SP1 is very usable. Microsoft seems to have listened to our rantings enough to fix a few things that annoyed everyone. I still don't want to switch just yet but I'll get another machine just for Vista. Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted May 16, 2008 how practical is it to partition a hard drive to have two operating systems (if you have enough space) or have two hard drives with different operating systems to boot from? but would you rather have an upgraded operating system based off xp (usability wise) or vista with sp1? Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted May 16, 2008 I'd dual boot with different hard drives for smoother use but you can partition just as easily and do the same thing. I'd go with an upgraded XP obviously but we don't have that option. Vista SP1 is the next step. Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted May 16, 2008 In my opinion microsoft should have brought out more service packs for XP before creating vista but i geuss we couldnt change that unless we worked in windows and even then we would have to be high up to change anything Share this post Link to post
BioBen 3 Posted May 17, 2008 Service Packs = $ New OS = $2 Microsoft's (and most company's) mentality. Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted May 17, 2008 I geuss thats true, its not like we are running round buying macs Share this post Link to post
Sonic 296 Posted May 17, 2008 Service Packs = $ New OS = $2 Service Packs are free. What gave you the impression there was a charge for them? Share this post Link to post
Luk3us 63 Posted May 19, 2008 They actually lose money on them, because they will send you out a DVD FOR FREE to update too. Share this post Link to post