What improvement would Generals/ZH need the most?

[Thierry 0]

15 now, more then most polls get :wink:

[GeneralZ 0]

16 now

[Thierry 0]

Bzzzt wrong, 17. EA seems to get the most votes

[GeneralZ 0]

WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

[GeneralZ 0]

never mind; i see that EA is the worst

[hamburglar 0]

I read a lot about the storyline being bad, the sides not being fair, but I don't think you mentioned the one thing that would make Zero hour flawless. Better online gameplay. Well first of all they have to get rid of the obvious flaws... Scud hack, mismatching, not allowing guys with FW's to play, etc... But one thing that would make the game so much better would be sharing/giving units and money to your teammates. In that case, say your ally is China Tank General, you can supply him with some artillery in exchange for some AA for yourself. If both of you have $2500, you give it to your buddy and he builds a Nuke... The game would be a lot more fun. Me and my friends always play, and usually they suck and I have to save them. I'd much rather send them some money or give them some supporting units.

 

I do have to agree with the fact that the storyline sucks, but really, I couldn't care less if the story sucked. Look at Counter-Strike for example... It has NO storyline, yet it is probably the most popular game online, because it requires teamwork to win. Also the sides could use a little balancing... Generals like the Nuke General and the Super Weapon General are way too good. As soon the the SW Gen gets Alpha Auroras, the game is pretty much over. Anything trying to approach the base dies instantly with one of the fuel air bombs. Nuke Gen is just too good. Awesome tanks and aircraft. Then you have guys like GLA Stealth and USA Original who just really suck. Well, that's my opinion on how to make Zero Hour better.

 

Peace

[Azrael 0]

Everything needs improvement, like the missions & storyline. Plus, it ain't that realistic from the weapons (10 nukes, anyone?).

[J-Fire_Man 0]

Who the hell made 10 nukes? :shock: It's damn crazy. The opponent must be very weak or stupid if someone can make SW that much.

[General Leang 0]

I have. It can be hard to do, but possible. I did the same thing with USA, built a lot of Particle Cannons to use in the final mission after I heard Bin Laden take credit for September 11.

[J-Fire_Man 0]

lol, it's good to have many particle cannon. I love particle cannon sooooooooo much. They are beautiful and devastating.

[General Leang 0]

Good stress relief to use them all on Al Qaeda...whoops, I mean GLA. I just wish we could use them on Al Qaeda.

[Warmatt16 0]

I'm really starting to like you! I agree entirly, that would be great! Al-Qaeda...Okay it's become my catch phrase here so...NUKE THEM ALL!

[J-Fire_Man 0]

I'm really starting to like you!

Hmm....something smells cheesy :lol:

 

Anyway, why are we talking about terrorist now? How about if we get back to the topic. It will be better.

[Warmatt16 0]

Your right. Sorry. And I was just saying that I seem to agree with General Leang more than not.

[J-Fire_Man 0]

Well, as always the most thing which need to be repaired is EA itself. Ea should give CnC title back to Westwood or Petroglyph.

[Warmatt16 0]

Agree 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000%

[J-Fire_Man 0]

But it sounds impossible, since they already ripped it off from Westwood.

[Warmatt16 0]

Once again, Big guy who has forgotten when he was the little guy eats the current little guy, thus is nature.

[J-Fire_Man 0]

Yeah, the rule of nature, the strong will surely torture the weak. The strong one have forgotten the time when they are still the "weak".

[Warmatt16 0]

They have forgotten the days of Desert Strike when they were like Westwood back with TD.

[J-Fire_Man 0]

Hmm...I never heard the word of EA before I play Yuri's Revenge when their logo shows off at the start. I guess they are not too famous in RTS gamers mind that time, when they are still a not powerfull company.

[Warmatt16 0]

Desert Strike was like 1992 I think. They were barly getting by. I think the next year they came out with Madden '93 and began the rise.

[J-Fire_Man 0]

EA becomes arrogant when they reached the peak and rule most games. It's the ussual type of a big company, forgotting their past and began a new reigm.

[Warmatt16 0]

They will have their reigm overthrown like Saddam's! Fight, Win, Prevail!

[J-Fire_Man 0]

lol, yeah the new generation will takeover the EA throne and begins to build a utopia for gamers.