PurpleGaga27 40 Posted December 5, 2010 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101205/ap_on_hi_te/wikileaks_50 Most website companies as sponsors drop Wikileaks. Looks like world didn't like Julian Assange since he has committed crimes lately and he's been wanted by Interpol and other secret service organizations for rape charges. Worse than that, he might become Time's 2010 Person of the Year since the voters have gone crazy on him. If he's indeed not a good person, so is his owned Wikileaks website. Share this post Link to post
Inferno 22 Posted December 5, 2010 Liked it's not backed up by several if not hundreds of other sites. If you think WikiLeaks is done for, you should probably get your brain rearranged. Share this post Link to post
Luk3us 63 Posted December 5, 2010 The site itself is irrelevant its all the juicy titbits that are important. Besides if the Wikilink guys were serious about this they could go create a thousand clone sites all over hte internet. But there isn't any need as they send all their crap to the media who do their job for them. Share this post Link to post
Guest Stevie_K Posted December 5, 2010 (edited) Charging him for rape is the only way they can justify arresting him and do whatever secret governmental dudes do. No doubt those girls have been paid a visit by some of those as well. EDIT: Not ONLY, but you get the point... Edited December 5, 2010 by Stevie_K Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted December 6, 2010 If he's indeed not a good person, so is his owned Wikileaks website. Yes, because a website's owner is indicative of the quality of the content. Makes perfect sense. Share this post Link to post
Inferno 22 Posted December 6, 2010 Charging him for rape is the only way they can justify arresting him and do whatever secret governmental dudes do. No doubt those girls have been paid a visit by some of those as well. EDIT: Not ONLY, but you get the point... It was the easiest to charge him with rape using those women because he actually had a relationship with them. Yes, because a website's owner is indicative of the quality of the content. Makes perfect sense. Indeed Share this post Link to post
PurpleGaga27 40 Posted December 7, 2010 (edited) The Wikileaks founder has thrown in the towel to authorities. Update: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/0...ape-allegations It also appears that the US government is about to prosecute Mr. Assange of releasing leaked secrets to Wikileaks without proper approval. Edited December 7, 2010 by purplescrin Share this post Link to post
Inferno 22 Posted December 7, 2010 He turned himself in... what a retard. Like he's going to get a fair trial. Share this post Link to post
Guest Stevie_K Posted December 7, 2010 He's got a lot of people with deep pockets that supports him apparently. He will survive, Although he might get assassinated as a Canadian politician openly said he thought that he deserved. Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted December 8, 2010 I quote South Park here, "**** Canada." Share this post Link to post
TheBlackOut 7 Posted December 8, 2010 This feels like a movie in the making, hahaha. Share this post Link to post
Inferno 22 Posted December 8, 2010 He's got a lot of people with deep pockets that supports him apparently. He will survive, Although he might get assassinated as a Canadian politician openly said he thought that he deserved. Politicians are meant to be politically correct, which pretty much means they have to lie, cover up mistakes and be as hypocritical as they can be. And of course, they try to save their own ass by all means necessary. So, no **** they condemn this man. Share this post Link to post
PurpleGaga27 40 Posted December 9, 2010 (edited) He's got a lot of people with deep pockets that supports him apparently. He will survive, Although he might get assassinated as a Canadian politician openly said he thought that he deserved. I hope not. He's been getting a lot of death threats recently around the world. Now it gets even more weird: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/0...bel-peace-prize **triple face palm for that article** Edited December 9, 2010 by purplescrin Share this post Link to post
Nmenth 291 Posted December 9, 2010 Why not? It's not like the Nobel Peace Prize actually has to be earned or anything. Share this post Link to post
Revolutionary 0 Posted December 9, 2010 Well for what he has done he is a better candidate that Obama ever was... Share this post Link to post
Inferno 22 Posted December 10, 2010 I hope not. He's been getting a lot of death threats recently around the world. Now it gets even more weird: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/0...bel-peace-prize **triple face palm for that article** He deserves that prize. Contrary to what world leaders and politicians are saying, he's making the world safer, though not for the world leaders and politicians themselves, obviously. Share this post Link to post