MR UNSEEN IN OTHER PC 0 Posted March 30, 2005 why is it that there is the gla instead of al-qaida, also why are the chinese involved, and why is it that the 3 other major powers, the british, french, and russians are not involved Share this post Link to post
Waraddict 0 Posted March 30, 2005 Okay, first of all al-qaida is not anywhere near a military like force like GLA, GLA is more like an alliance of arabian militias and armies with a touch of terrorism. second, if an RTS game can minimise the good side to the US, they will, regardless whether its American or not strangely, I don't know why but even European RTS do that, e.g Eugen's Act of War and RealityPump's World War III. Russia isn't too powerful anymore, in 20 years time China will be a superpower nevermind a major power so between Russia and China, China was the more intelligent choice and besides, it was more original to pick China too... Share this post Link to post
Cygnus X-1 12 Posted March 31, 2005 If it was Russia, US, Europe and GLA it would be RA with the GLA added in. Not too original. Share this post Link to post
General Patton 0 Posted March 31, 2005 Russia is quickly going down the drain: their economy and their military is falling apart. And France and Britain are nowhere near as powerful militarily or economically as the US. Share this post Link to post
Tom 0 Posted March 31, 2005 you lot were can i get gens+zh for relly cheap :?: Share this post Link to post
MR UNSEEN 0 Posted April 1, 2005 waraddicts 2nd dosn't make sence, and it wouldn't be like RA if the french, brits, and yanks were saperated instead of a sub fraction, also why is it the gla attack china, after all they are muslims and i dont see any reason why islamic terrorist would attack china, maybe a marxist lenninist group but not a muslim group, oh, well russia could be fighting the terrorist becouse they could have been supporting the chechens Share this post Link to post
Waraddict 0 Posted April 1, 2005 waraddicts 2nd dosn't make sence, and it wouldn't be like RA if the french, brits, and yanks were saperated instead of a sub fraction, also why is it the gla attack china, after all they are muslims and i dont see any reason why islamic terrorist would attack china, maybe a marxist lenninist group but not a muslim group, oh, well russia could be fighting the terrorist becouse they could have been supporting the chechens Well, if they are Kazachstani muslims its possible but then again in some missions GLA seems more anti-kazachstan. However, its worth pointing out that under no circumstance did EA ever make clear of GLA's beliefs or goals, for all we know they might not be islamic (though then again, they probably left that out due to legal reasons). Note: to any muslims, no offence meant, try to understand we are not indicating that people are terrorists because they are muslim, that, we both know, is rubbish and flawed logic. As for my statement about the good side, I meant in most cases, its rare that any european country appears in an RTS (except in WWII Rts and Red Alert), even if the game is European made, frankly I think the US is overated in these games now, its getting quite unoriginal.... It would be great to have a near future game with Europe as the good side for once... Share this post Link to post
MR UNSEEN 0 Posted April 2, 2005 thanks, it makes more sense now but why would euro rts not have their own siode and if the gla arent islamic what are they Share this post Link to post
Waraddict 0 Posted April 2, 2005 Don't know, but not a single one yells 'Allah' or anything like that, EA probably hinted that they are but never really clarified it. Share this post Link to post
Cygnus X-1 12 Posted April 2, 2005 Legal reasons. And I believe I heard at least one "Allah" in there. No offense to any muslims out there, society is really unfair, ya'know? Maybe there could be a game where another war breaks out in Europe only no outsiders get involved. BTW I think EA left Europe out because 1:The EU dosnt like getting involved in messy affairs with other countries(such as warfare) 2: They dont want to spoil RA3 which wil probably feature a few EU nations. Although with all the Westwood staff leaving EA, RA3 is probably gona suck. Share this post Link to post
GeneralZ 0 Posted April 2, 2005 have any of u noticed that most of the GLA buildings are mosques..... Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted April 3, 2005 Well.....at first I'm kinda pissed off by the storyline of CNC Generals. But it's ok, I see nothing which offended my religion. Eventough most GLA buildings are quite looks like a mosque. Thats the architectural style, yes RRRRRRRight. Eventough they looks like a mosque, they actually not a mosque. Many islamic architectures are absorbed in Middle East and Russia's building architecture. Besides, a mosque is not a place to train soldiers. Legal reasons. And I believe I heard at least one "Allah" in there. I heard none. Might just a mishearing. Share this post Link to post
Cygnus X-1 12 Posted April 3, 2005 Maybe I should play the GLA campaign again (oh boy :roll: ) I pretty sure it was there. Maybe something similar perhaps. Share this post Link to post
J-Fire_Man 0 Posted April 3, 2005 Why should you, lol Playing the campaign again just to find one word Share this post Link to post
Cygnus X-1 12 Posted April 3, 2005 Well, somebody asked, and I dont have anything better to do since KOTOR II doesnt want to cooperate and run properly Share this post Link to post
dapperdan 0 Posted April 9, 2005 u might have heard it amongst the shoutings of the angry mob. i beleive that america are used no matter what country the game makers are from simply because its more marketable. We British dnt have the military might to match the US anymore, but we are damn close, and i would love to see my country be more involved in games. Share this post Link to post
Cygnus X-1 12 Posted April 9, 2005 Be nice to see some more European involvement. Britian, Germany, Fra...well, maybe not them, but you get the point. Poland and Spain too. Share this post Link to post
MR UNSEEN 0 Posted May 8, 2005 I would also like to see the uk, also why is it that the f-22s in the game can be carrier based, thats not right, raptors are not naval planes Share this post Link to post
Cygnus X-1 12 Posted May 8, 2005 It would not be that dificult (despite what buerocracy has to say) to modify F-22's to be carrier based. I think they should have put in F-18's for the carriers though. Share this post Link to post
shadowfx78 0 Posted May 8, 2005 i would have loved to see F-14's on the carriers they rock. They have some of the best capabilities of any jet in service today. Share this post Link to post
Yuri_Copy 0 Posted May 9, 2005 i would have loved to see F-14's on the carriers they rock. They have some of the best capabilities of any jet in service today. Yeah I think the same as you. Share this post Link to post
VampireA05 0 Posted May 13, 2005 what about those Harriers?? The Brits has it right??? (correct me please) Russia with Shukoi fighters China with Valiant Dragon (i forgot how they spell it in Chinese) Ok...we have a fighter jumble sales here... P/s: J-Fire, you're muslim??? Share this post Link to post