sith_wampa 6 Posted November 16, 2008 That's obviously not the only reason... Share this post Link to post
Doctor Destiny 41 Posted November 17, 2008 But it is a major reason No it isn't. Share this post Link to post
TheBlackOut 6 Posted November 18, 2008 I can think of "He isn't Bush for four more years" as most people's top reason... Oh, and he didn't pick some dingbat as his vice president. Share this post Link to post
rEdaSbLood 1 Posted November 18, 2008 a dingbat who thought Africa was a country.......... Share this post Link to post
TheBlackOut 6 Posted November 18, 2008 a dingbat who thought Africa was a country.......... wait, so south africa isn't a state of Africa? Share this post Link to post
rEdaSbLood 1 Posted November 18, 2008 (edited) lolz yea there is. in alaska, when you take the bridge to terabithia COUGH i mean nowhere, it leads to the state of south africa... Edited November 18, 2008 by rEdaSbLood Share this post Link to post
Mina Synd 0 Posted November 19, 2008 ... o-O; XD africa has too many countries in it. i know most of the big ones... but there are just too many to remember. i'd probably know them all, but i'd look at a map and go "oh yah i forgot about that. and that. and that." but i would have heard of them before and i could probably put them in the right place... but yah there were multiple reasons why obama was chosen. most of the white people chose him because it was a change from bush, but a large majority (i'm not saying all, not even most, but a large amount) only went to vote because it was the first black candidate... most of them normally wouldn't bother voting... that is what made it so unique. that one election made so many -more- people vote... both ways, generally because they REALLY didn't want the other guy to win xD but yah there are always some exceptions: like that black guy who voted a dozen times and actually admited it to fox news live on election night XD or one of my white female friends who didn't vote at all because of a very complex, indepth belief that the whole political system is redundant right now. (i mean it pretty much is. she got me to read up on how the college vote works. seriously, wtf. a "sensible" person, generally someone rich or with power gets chosen for every seat that their state has... then they vote for the whole state. i dunno about you, but that is beyond dodgy to me. no doubt people are gonna come back and whine that's not how it happens, but i just read that from wiki on the subject... and pretty much the popular vote doesn't matter.) so she see's no point in voting until the people actually get to choose their president o.o i just know my little description of the college vote is going to get whiners, but once again i'm just reading from wiki... either way it's not a very fair method. those specific seat totals just deciding for the whole state? wtf? D: i mean people feel free to correct me there if i've misunderstood it (the wiki was basically just talking about the whole system for all countries using that method so there might be variencies between countries...) Share this post Link to post
Hybrid 0 Posted February 7, 2009 There is no new world order. what the **** are these babbling idiots rambling about now? Voting in someone else with new ideas falls quite short of revolution, rebellion, new world orders, conspiracy, etc. Besides, they're only placing so much emphasis on Obama because he's black and people still give a **** about skin color. If this were a white guy with the same idea, it would just be yet another Liberal. Don't confuse suttle racism with intellectualism. Sorry fen was trolling: No "New World Order" huh? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLOUbz8j8k4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8l6Af74rCY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r7htckec-U (Gary Hart 1 day after 9/11) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93zOPbKv-Ic And Henry Kissinger: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/81966 GORDON Brown was last night accused of “losing his marbles” after hailing Britain’s bloodbath of job cuts as the “birth pangs of a new global order”. Just a few searches. I suggest you check your facts. Its not a theory; there is a globalist ideology for a single world government, world bank, world heath authority, etc. Politicians, economists and the likes are all openly telling about it and it is planned. Its more an idea; a centralisation of global power into a single global authority. There are groups guiding this through lobbying and inviting politicians to their conferences. Check out the Bilderberg and CFR. Bilderberg: Oh and yay for obama! Socialism for all, whether you like it or not. You guys should have supported Ron Paul why you had the chance [/END TROLL] Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted February 8, 2009 as I sit in this cell I can not help but think of the ultimate defeat served to us... I will escape... isnt obama closing quantanimo?? i dont know how to spell it aaand everyone has just taken to ignoring me now. fine, whatever. Because you seem to ramble the summerys helped with that Share this post Link to post
Nmenth 289 Posted February 8, 2009 isnt obama closing quantanimo?? i dont know how to spell it Yes. Guantanamo. Will that herald the return of the Shah? I think certain people around here hope not... Share this post Link to post
TheBlackOut 6 Posted February 8, 2009 isnt obama closing quantanimo?? i dont know how to spell it If you don't know how to spell it properly, you could always spell Gitmo, which most people use to refer to Guantanamo. As Nmenth said, yes, he is, but there seems to be problems with some prisoners having no where to go. I think some Chinese terrorist have been rejected by Canada recently and China said anyone who accepts them will be frowned upon. Share this post Link to post
Nmenth 289 Posted February 8, 2009 (edited) there seems to be problems with some prisoners having no where to go. I think some Chinese terrorist have been rejected by Canada recently and China said anyone who accepts them will be frowned upon. As must be expected when you submit to the dictations of mass media. The only thing they care about is those that claim innocence, but if you open a prison camp for terrorists, is it a surprise that you will then have to deal with terrorists? Edited February 9, 2009 by Nmenth Share this post Link to post
Julbri 0 Posted February 9, 2009 Yes. Guantanamo. Will that herald the return of the Shah? I think certain people around here hope not... I was thinking the same thing.. but maybe he will get into canada..... if he does i doubt it will be legally Share this post Link to post