C&C's Superweapon's & Reality

[Acerz492 1]

*shrugs* We'll see. Mind you, would be interesting. Who'll be in charge? Why, NZ of course :lol:

[Cygnus X-1 12]

And all her Allies

[Acerz492 1]

Which happen to include Australia, and...I don't know. Speaking of which, it was ANZAC day two days ago (monday). Hmm..also heard about some sort of new nuclear weapon or something. Sounded like something a Desolator would use. Anyone know what that could be? It's probably nothing though. As, of course, the UN would never approve of such weapons

[Cygnus X-1 12]

Neither would US congress. I dont like either of them. Its time we took matters into our own hands. Forget the UN. The world needs saving NOW, not after the coffee break.

[apocolyp4 0]

If the world needs saving for the terroist right now then why did the us invade iraq and use most of its resources taking over a country which posed no threat and everyone knew it. This aint an anti invade Iraq because of oil rant but more of a why isnt the US focusing on the people who have and will again attack US and european soil?

[Dark_Kodiak 0]

Cuz theyre covering something up! Dont get me wrong im not one of those conspiracy people.Maybe if ...

 

The Soviet union is reborn and does a "lightning war" campaign against Europe( To achieve a Continental Motherland,

 

China attacks Taiwan,

 

Japan and Australia see their opportunity to take some land,

 

Africa becomes a unified nation to protect itself,

 

India nukes pakistan and pakistan blows up india with a weapon more powerful than a nuke,

 

Cuba tries to nuke the US but their nukes are shot down with starwars( Or something better :?: ),

 

THEN the US and the other countries would have no choice but to use ... SUPERWEAPONS!!!

 

THATS where the Antarctic army comes in Made up of angry canadians and civilians from the warring countries? :?

[Acerz492 1]

Angry canadians! good one! I think your antartic army would include NZers as well...mainly because..you know, we have plastic rocket launchers and tanks that are older than the Scorpians, or maybe we even have Scorpians, I dunno. OH! And our rockets? Tin cans packed with explosives. :lol:

[Waraddict 0]

Scorpions are relatively modern British light tanks,

 

Here's a pic of one owned by the Irish Defence Force

http://www.military.ie/images/cav_pic1.jpg

 

The GLA Scorpion however actually seems to be a Russian IS-2

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/is-2.htm

or a Russian T-34

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t-34.htm

 

What Canada has it these

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/leopard1.htm

The German Leopard 1, quite old these days but definetly newer then what the GLA has...

[Cygnus X-1 12]

Pardon my saying, but Irag was killing its own people....and was a very big threat to the peace in the Middle East. And we didnt use up all our resources.

[Waraddict 0]

Pardon my saying, but Irag was killing its own people....and was a very big threat to the peace in the Middle East. And we didnt use up all our resources.

 

Two points,

one, the country is not 'Irag' it's 'Iraq', and g isn't even near q!

 

two, I would plead to you to ignore any Iraq war comment, I think you would agree that we all have our different views towards the war and our views will not change in some rubbish forum conversation, it will serve no purpose, this topic should serve only its original purpose.

 

If someone attempts to change the conversation to the Iraq War after this post, I would suggest a board admin to ban him, because honestly I am sick of idiots who honestly think such an arguement can be resolved.

[BWare 0]

Pardon my saying, but Irag was killing its own people....and was a very big threat to the peace in the Middle East. And we didnt use up all our resources.

 

Two points,

one, the country is not 'Irag' it's 'Iraq', and g isn't even near q!

 

two, I would plead to you to ignore any Iraq war comment, I think you would agree that we all have our different views towards the war and our views will not change in some rubbish forum conversation, it will serve no purpose, this topic should serve only its original purpose.

 

If someone attempts to change the conversation to the Iraq War after this post, I would suggest a board admin to ban him, because honestly I am sick of idiots who honestly think such an arguement can be resolved.

Waraddict, are you a moderator? :roll:

That threat is far beyond your authority. Now watch me defy your nonexistant authority... ready? Cygnus, I agree. WHOAH!! Now I'll just wait to get banned :roll:

 

 

Oh, and one more thing... a spelling correction is not a "point."

[Saracen 16]

You're banned.... from denying any instinctive thoughts you still have

 

As long as it isn't political correction you have to make, I don't have a problem... everything's too PC these days... :roll:

[Acerz492 1]

Don't get people started on being PC :lol: PC-ness will be one of humanity's downfalls. Haha, Irag. Don't know why but the spelling cracked me up. Oh well. 8)

[Waraddict 0]

Pardon my saying, but Irag was killing its own people....and was a very big threat to the peace in the Middle East. And we didnt use up all our resources.

 

Two points,

one, the country is not 'Irag' it's 'Iraq', and g isn't even near q!

 

two, I would plead to you to ignore any Iraq war comment, I think you would agree that we all have our different views towards the war and our views will not change in some rubbish forum conversation, it will serve no purpose, this topic should serve only its original purpose.

 

If someone attempts to change the conversation to the Iraq War after this post, I would suggest a board admin to ban him, because honestly I am sick of idiots who honestly think such an arguement can be resolved.

Waraddict, are you a moderator? :roll:

That threat is far beyond your authority. Now watch me defy your nonexistant authority... ready? Cygnus, I agree. WHOAH!! Now I'll just wait to get banned :roll:

 

 

Oh, and one more thing... a spelling correction is not a "point."

 

It's called humour! :roll: errr, well I suppose its rubbish humour...

 

But anyway, if I WAS a moderator I wouldn't have SUGGESTED someone to get banned, I would have banned em on the spot! :lol:

 

Okay, this thread seems to be going down hill now...

 

Here's something mildly related to the topic...

 

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/fcs.htm

 

roll down to the pic on the bottom, its a design for a new tank which will have multi-barreled rail cannons, a high energy laser cannon and a vertical rocket launcher, and its half the weight of the Abram too! Hard to believe it could probably kick a Mammoth MKII's ass.

 

It's kind of like how people in the mid 20th believed technology to go, bigger and better, but infact its smaller and better...

[DemonHunter 0]

if the canadians are put in, then i sure hope they put in the h bomb so tht we can remove them again lol

[Saracen 16]

You should watch what you type. THINK before posting!

[apocolyp4 0]

I think I can translate what DemonHunter type in.

 

I think hes trying to say that he hopes that Canada get put into C&C Generals and that for a super weapon they have a thermal nuclear bomb so that they can repel an American invasion just like in the 1812 war.

[Dark_Kodiak 0]

anyway..... Whats all this about a nuclear explosion in the 1890s or something? It occured in the Soviet Unioun and left HUGE ammounts of radiation. More than a nuke ever could :?

 

Since this is a superweapons and reality forum (me thinx it call tht) please respond. I wanna know!!! I so confused.

[GeneralZ 0]

wasnt that the chernobyl accident, where a nuclear powerplant blew?

[Acerz492 1]

:roll: Dude, the Chernobyl accident happened around 1986. Dark Kodiak is refering to the Tunguska Incident of 1908. Read all about it here:

 

http://www.qsl.net/w5www/tunguska.html

 

However some people believe that it was Nikola Tesla's "Death Ray" experiment gone horribly wrong:

 

http://www.galisteo.com/tunguska/bbs/messages/110.html

 

I think I'll stick to the first one..I'm not sure if I'm going to believe the Tesla experiment theory. :roll:

[GeneralZ 0]

oops, thought u mean 1980s...

[Acerz492 1]

It's cool, though it took me 5 mins remembering about these incidents, plus a little bit of google, for those to come up..so you could've searched them yourself. But I had nothing better to do and the Tunguska Incident is really interesting anyway, considering that it was before Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Makes you think, dosen't it?

[Scorpio XIII 0]

Well back to the Superweapon issue... The Soviet Iron Curtain is (I bet you already know this) related to the "curtain" dividing East and West Europe stated by Winston Churchill, including the Berlin Wall, was "Inpenetrable and Invincible" by Western powers. Just like the Iron Curtain SW provides Invincibility.

I also wish the Nuke was bigger but itd overpower the other sides. Then finnaly to the Chronosphere issue, I wouldn't be suprised if it did exist ( in Area 51 :wink: ).

[Acerz492 1]

Nice little gifs there dude, where'd you get 'em?

 

That's what the Iron Curtian was based on, but thanks for the elightenment, not many people would've know that little fact. Countless times have I explained to idiots about the origins of the Iron Curtain. Not saying that you're an idiot, mind you.

 

As for the Chronosphere? Well, I'm just waiting till they have a commercially available one :wink: :lol:

[Dark_Kodiak 0]

f it was in fact a death thingy, why hasn't anyone rebuilt it during the cold war or right now? the government is hiding something........